They are debating how many debates there should be.

They are debating how many debates there should be. But there were too many and that hurt Mitt Romney. But it makes it look like Hillary is trying to deny her competitors equal opportunity. Good bloody grief, people. Here's a thought. How about we consider whether there is any substantive content to any of the debates, whether they provide any relevant information or insights for the public, or possibly whether the term "debate" applies to this process, at all? Maybe you could determine how many there should be and how long they go on by considering the subject matter that might need to be covered? Or you could just put marathons of old Scooby-Doo episodes on because you are rapidly making me far more interested in how Velma solves yet another conundrum or what is in those scooby snacks?