Hi.
Hi. I just caught up. A) I guess women will have to cover all exposed skin, then, as it excretes, and B) Breasts secrete. If you are going to repress people, you could, you know, at least do it right. Oh, and there might be bare breasts in the link? In case you slip and hit play.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/rep-rayne-brown-north-carolina-introduces-bill-criminalizing-nipple-exposure_n_2695720.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/rep-rayne-brown-north-carolina-introduces-bill-criminalizing-nipple-exposure_n_2695720.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/rep-rayne-brown-north-carolina-introduces-bill-criminalizing-nipple-exposure_n_2695720.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/rep-rayne-brown-north-carolina-introduces-bill-criminalizing-nipple-exposure_n_2695720.html
And if they mean to include secretion as well as excretion, there will be a whole lot of trouble as people try to figure out how to see through covered eyes.
ReplyDeleteI summed this up to Evan "Skwid" Langlinais His blank stare with a hint of glare was exactly how I felt.
ReplyDeleteSince male breasts can, in fact, in fairly rare cases, lactate, I assume they'll fine any shirtless man just as hard.
ReplyDelete(Straight face, dammit, straight)
Jasper Janssen "of the female human breast". So only if they're M2F transsexuals?
ReplyDelete