TIL that some languages apparently have words inherently differentiating one's status as a citizen or resident of the entity versus a member of a particular ethnic or cultural group? I don't quite grasp the whole thing, although I heard the point being made. What's interesting to me is a) that there is such a thing, which seems very revealing of something about a culture that would need such concepts built into the language, and b) that there seem to be people who think it's inaccurate to interpret the word choice as meaningful. Firstly, since languages have all sorts of concepts built into them, many very specific to their primary culture of use, it seems reasonable that such a thing could exist. Not that I would have thought of it before, since I'm not from a culture where that sort of subtlety functions. Secondly, if that is, indeed, the subtlety of the word choices, where one essentially and inherently includes people, and the other excludes, then I'd kind o...
That sounds fascinating.
ReplyDeleteIt's an Ottolenghi recipe, although I got it second hand and do not own the actual cookbook. I think it is from Jerusalem, though?
ReplyDeletenom nom
ReplyDeleteIs it the one with the oats and hazelnuts?
ReplyDeleteNope. It's tahini, butter, sugar, flour, vanilla, and a little bit of cream. He's got several and they are all really awesome. In fact, there were some cookie recipes from his new all dessert cookbook that looked really interesting.
ReplyDelete