TIL that some languages apparently have words inherently differentiating one's status as a citizen or resident of the entity versus a member of a particular ethnic or cultural group? I don't quite grasp the whole thing, although I heard the point being made. What's interesting to me is a) that there is such a thing, which seems very revealing of something about a culture that would need such concepts built into the language, and b) that there seem to be people who think it's inaccurate to interpret the word choice as meaningful. Firstly, since languages have all sorts of concepts built into them, many very specific to their primary culture of use, it seems reasonable that such a thing could exist. Not that I would have thought of it before, since I'm not from a culture where that sort of subtlety functions. Secondly, if that is, indeed, the subtlety of the word choices, where one essentially and inherently includes people, and the other excludes, then I'd kind o...
:(
ReplyDeleteFood & Wine has similar. https://www.foodandwine.com/recipes/wild-rice-stuffing-with-chestnuts-and-sausage
ReplyDeleteThere's also a Williams-Sonoma one that looks like it could be easily adapted with leeks.
Good luck.
foodandwine.com - Wild Rice Stuffing with Chestnuts and Sausage
Interesting. I definitely didn't thicken it or use sage. I probably used thyme, though?
ReplyDeleteF-L Silver I figured you would remember with enough hints. I'm sure you cobbled together many recipes.
ReplyDeleteThat one I actually whipped up from scratch. I mean, I'm sure you understand the uncontrollable urge to wild rice everything.
ReplyDelete