TIL that some languages apparently have words inherently differentiating one's status as a citizen or resident of the entity versus a member of a particular ethnic or cultural group? I don't quite grasp the whole thing, although I heard the point being made. What's interesting to me is a) that there is such a thing, which seems very revealing of something about a culture that would need such concepts built into the language, and b) that there seem to be people who think it's inaccurate to interpret the word choice as meaningful. Firstly, since languages have all sorts of concepts built into them, many very specific to their primary culture of use, it seems reasonable that such a thing could exist. Not that I would have thought of it before, since I'm not from a culture where that sort of subtlety functions. Secondly, if that is, indeed, the subtlety of the word choices, where one essentially and inherently includes people, and the other excludes, then I'd kind o...
I bought some pretty good leaf lard in a jar from a place near me called Pure Pastures. I don't remember the brand...this isn't really helpful.
ReplyDeleteThe brand is Fatworks. Fatworksfoods.com
ReplyDeletethx!
ReplyDeleteIsn’t the whole point of lard that it tastes like pork? Otherwise you’d be using butter?
ReplyDeleteNot in baking, no. I mean, you will still get a slightly different flavor than butter or fake fat (aka Crisco), but its purpose in baking is to be as neutral in flavor as possible while adding the marvels of cooking with a saturated fat (flakiness, crispiness, etc.).
ReplyDelete