I think I would really like to reach a point where I cannot be shocked.

I think I would really like to reach a point where I cannot be shocked. Truly. I can't handle this stuff. Like, why even invite these women if you didn't want to hear from them?

http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/06/15/female-democratic-senators-ignore-2-women-activists-at-hearing-on-islamism-pose-questions-only-to-male-witness/

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/22/opinion/kamala-harris-islamism-senate-hearing.html


http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/06/15/female-democratic-senators-ignore-2-women-activists-at-hearing-on-islamism-pose-questions-only-to-male-witness/

Comments

  1. Jeffrey HuoJune 22, 2017 at 9:11 PM

    It's a little bit more complicated than that. Google "right wing" and the names of each of those two women. Then ask yourself why those two specific women were invited, and who you think did the inviting, and what their true mutual agenda was.

    I'm betting pretty strongly it wasn't any of the Democratic women who selected those two specific witnesses. And if they didn't already know, that their staffers prepared deep enough background to have answered those questions above.

    ReplyDelete
  2. F-L SilverJune 23, 2017 at 6:53 AM

    Ok, so apparently Ron Johnson invited them as chairperson and there are 11 men on that committee, so it's stupid to call out the 4 women. Not impressed with the Times' coverage on this, given what you pointed out. Thanks for the heads-up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jeffrey HuoJune 23, 2017 at 7:59 AM

    The rabbit hole goes deeper - your second article was authored by the two witnesses themselves. The first article was authored by Andy Ngo - and google that name and "right wing".

    No, none of this is an accident.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog