TIL that some languages apparently have words inherently differentiating one's status as a citizen or resident of the entity versus a member of a particular ethnic or cultural group? I don't quite grasp the whole thing, although I heard the point being made. What's interesting to me is a) that there is such a thing, which seems very revealing of something about a culture that would need such concepts built into the language, and b) that there seem to be people who think it's inaccurate to interpret the word choice as meaningful. Firstly, since languages have all sorts of concepts built into them, many very specific to their primary culture of use, it seems reasonable that such a thing could exist. Not that I would have thought of it before, since I'm not from a culture where that sort of subtlety functions. Secondly, if that is, indeed, the subtlety of the word choices, where one essentially and inherently includes people, and the other excludes, then I'd kind o...
( nods nods ) This is the area my mentor at Hopkins is closely involved in. The catch so far is that the level of chimerism - the amount of human stem cell that can successfully stick around in the host animal - remains extremely small, and the level of development is poor. Still a lot of work to be done in this field.
ReplyDeleteI thought of the Island of Dr. Moreau, then immediately hoped that the reality was at least better than the movie.
ReplyDelete