TIL that some languages apparently have words inherently differentiating one's status as a citizen or resident of the entity versus a member of a particular ethnic or cultural group? I don't quite grasp the whole thing, although I heard the point being made. What's interesting to me is a) that there is such a thing, which seems very revealing of something about a culture that would need such concepts built into the language, and b) that there seem to be people who think it's inaccurate to interpret the word choice as meaningful. Firstly, since languages have all sorts of concepts built into them, many very specific to their primary culture of use, it seems reasonable that such a thing could exist. Not that I would have thought of it before, since I'm not from a culture where that sort of subtlety functions. Secondly, if that is, indeed, the subtlety of the word choices, where one essentially and inherently includes people, and the other excludes, then I'd kind o...
:-/
ReplyDeleteI had been using Steven Colbert and Trevor Noah to follow the conventions, but last night my DVR said PGA Championship Highlights instead of The Late Show, so I missed the whole damn thing. I am hoping I was able to record enough of random shows on Comedy Central to get something of the Daily Show, since they have no idea what their schedule actually is, but I really have no idea. So pissed.
ReplyDeleteThe Daily Show is pretty good about having full episodes online, I believe.
ReplyDelete