TIL that some languages apparently have words inherently differentiating one's status as a citizen or resident of the entity versus a member of a particular ethnic or cultural group? I don't quite grasp the whole thing, although I heard the point being made. What's interesting to me is a) that there is such a thing, which seems very revealing of something about a culture that would need such concepts built into the language, and b) that there seem to be people who think it's inaccurate to interpret the word choice as meaningful. Firstly, since languages have all sorts of concepts built into them, many very specific to their primary culture of use, it seems reasonable that such a thing could exist. Not that I would have thought of it before, since I'm not from a culture where that sort of subtlety functions. Secondly, if that is, indeed, the subtlety of the word choices, where one essentially and inherently includes people, and the other excludes, then I'd kind o...
Oh, no! A spray with a long range?
ReplyDeleteA dad with a spray. Also, we are waiting until around sunset, when they will be less active. Really, though, we are waiting for that because it is under the deck, right behind several of my potted herbs and I want to be able to move them so the poison doesn't get on the herbs. What with, you know, eating them and all. Also, my mom has to move some of her flower pots out of the way so the spray can get a clear path under the deck to the hornets.
ReplyDeleteGood luck!
ReplyDeleteWe are tentatively hornet free.
ReplyDelete