Even if the science weren't equivocal*, you know what red flags me?
Even if the science weren't equivocal*, you know what red flags me? St. Louis. It has a less than savory reputation for venue, juries, and medical/science cases and awards. And I'm being polite.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/johnson-johnson-ordered-to-pay-55-million-to-survivor-in-talc-cancer-case-a7012411.html
*I use talcum powder. In fact, I use Johnson & Johnson. I preferred a specific cornstarch baby powder that ceased to exist long ago because it was milled with a much better texture and no stinky perfumes, but all the alternatives I have found are expensive and no better texture-wise than standard "baby powder". For fairness, if you can find me a paper with strong evidence that this is a verifiable connection and broad risk to the population in general, I will rescind my consideration that the evidence is equivocal.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/johnson-johnson-ordered-to-pay-55-million-to-survivor-in-talc-cancer-case-a7012411.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/johnson-johnson-ordered-to-pay-55-million-to-survivor-in-talc-cancer-case-a7012411.html
*I use talcum powder. In fact, I use Johnson & Johnson. I preferred a specific cornstarch baby powder that ceased to exist long ago because it was milled with a much better texture and no stinky perfumes, but all the alternatives I have found are expensive and no better texture-wise than standard "baby powder". For fairness, if you can find me a paper with strong evidence that this is a verifiable connection and broad risk to the population in general, I will rescind my consideration that the evidence is equivocal.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/johnson-johnson-ordered-to-pay-55-million-to-survivor-in-talc-cancer-case-a7012411.html
Comments
Post a Comment